Blog Post 3: Research Gap


The research gap identified in my literature review is multifold rather than singular. My topic of research is how to use psychographic analytics to develop reader personae representative of a genre audience by using generative AI platforms like ChatGPT.

Currently, the bulk of the PTW research I have reviewed shows multiple gaps. First, there is a surprising (sort of) lack of discussion defining genre fiction; initial research suggests that PTW researchers haven't really considered fiction writing professional enough. Second, almost every piece of literature I looked at for psychographics talks about using market segmentation studies as a way to sell a product AFTER it has been developed; there really aren't many articles that I came across that suggested psychographics could be developed as a pre-writing tool to heighten the successful design of fiction plots, themes, and characters to appeal to a target audience. Likewise, nearly everything I looked at for personae was also marketing based, focused on developing personae from what we know about wants/desires to develop a marketing strategy; instead, I am focusing on employing the development of psychographic-based personae as a pre-writing development tool.

Finally, the big ticket item is how to use generative AI platforms like ChatGPT to speed the process of data collection, the development and refinement of psychographic profiles to generate a more comprehensive reader persona against which plot, theme, and character concepts can be tested and refined to improve the quality of the outline and, eventually, the finished product and its marketing strategies.

Key gap items: pre-writing psychographics, reader personae, Creative Writing programs, writing to market, writing to audience, writing to genre, generative AI.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

 Blog 5 What have you learned about the processes of designing a sound research study in class?  In many ways, the process of writing the research proposal was not too different from how I conceived my Master's thesis or how I approached writing proposals for Department of Labor-Employment and Training Administration grants. The key differences in the writing was that this was a method design specific to the PTW profession, which was a bit different than how Geographers approach a similar type of study...and yet, they were more alike than not. The structural approach was interesting, and having the lit review done first definitely allowed me to better conceptualize what it was I wanted to do for the usability study I proposed. What have these processes taught you about your future roles as a technical and professional communicator? As mentioned before, this is not too dissimilar from what I have done in the past. However, after several years being unemployed after leaving ...
Read more
 Blog Post 2 I am not pleased. I have specific ideas of what I want to do for my literature review. Unfortunately, I can find pretty much zero peer reviewed articles for any variation of what I want to do, regardless of which platform I use. Specifically, these are my updated ideas for a literature review: 1. Using Psychographics to Generate Ideal Reader Personas for Fiction Writers 2. Using Psychographics to Analyze Market Trends in Speculative Fiction 3. Using Generative AI in Refining Plot Narratives in Speculative Fiction 4. Using Generative AI to Develop Ideal Reader Personas I have a few other variations on the theme, which is wholly applicable to rhetoric. No matter what keyword I use, however, I am getting no reasonable results that align with the topic...or, at least, none that would make any sense, since they're all over the map on what psychographics would be used for in designing a written product. Of the articles I have managed to find, these are the closest I have bee...
Read more